82,891
edits
Lend Me Your Love: Difference between revisions
→Transaction analysis
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
*We surmise that Mr Slim is intending to take Baby’s love and [[reuse]] it elsewhere. | *We surmise that Mr Slim is intending to take Baby’s love and [[reuse]] it elsewhere. | ||
*Seeing as he has at least an equivalent amount of his own love which he is holding subject to a fixed charge, we can only surmise that Baby’s love and Memphis Slim’s love cannot be [[fungible]] (otherwise this would be a transaction without any economic substance. Which would get Memphis Slim’s [[tax]] [[Mediocre lawyer|lawyers]] in a lather.) | *Seeing as he has at least an equivalent amount of his own love which he is holding subject to a fixed charge, we can only surmise that Baby’s love and Memphis Slim’s love cannot be [[fungible]] (otherwise this would be a transaction without any economic substance. Which would get Memphis Slim’s [[tax]] [[Mediocre lawyer|lawyers]] in a lather.) | ||
*While their respective loves might not be [[fungible]], Mr Slim contemplates buying out his obligations under the [[love mortgage]], perhaps with love received from this other woman, raising the prospect that womanly love might (in Mr Slim’s [[Legal opinion|opinion]], at any rate) be freely exchangeable, strongly [[correlated]] [[mark-to-market]] values, if not outright [[fungible]]. | |||
{{seealso}} | {{seealso}} | ||
*[[Rebel Yell]] | *[[Rebel Yell]] | ||
[[Category:Pop songs which correctly use terms of legal art]] | [[Category:Pop songs which correctly use terms of legal art]] | ||