82,891
edits
Limited recourse: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{a| | {{a|repack|{{image|Fidgety phillip|jpg|What happens if you do not concentrate on your debt extinction language}}}}Of a {{tag|contract}}, that a debtor’s obligations under it are limited to a defined pool of assets. You see this a lot in [[repackaging]]s, [[securitisation]]s and other structured transactions involving [[espievie]]s. [[Security]] and [[limited recourse]] are fundamental structural aspects of contracts with [[special purpose vehicle]]s and [[investment fund]]s. | ||
}}Of a {{tag|contract}}, that a debtor’s obligations under it are limited to a defined pool of assets. You see this a lot in [[repackaging]]s, [[securitisation]]s and other structured transactions involving [[espievie]]s. [[Security]] and [[limited recourse]] are fundamental structural aspects of contracts with [[special purpose vehicle]]s and [[investment fund]]s. | |||
===The basic idea=== | ===The basic idea=== | ||
| Line 23: | Line 21: | ||
==Multi-issuance [[repackaging]] vehicles: secured, limited recourse== | ==Multi-issuance [[repackaging]] vehicles: secured, limited recourse== | ||
{{Repackaging limited recourse capsule}} | {{Repackaging limited recourse capsule}} | ||
{{limited value of security in repack}} | |||
===“[[Extinction]]” versus “[[no debt due]]”?=== | ===“[[Extinction]]” versus “[[no debt due]]”?=== | ||
{{extinction vs no debt due}} | {{extinction vs no debt due}} | ||
| Line 69: | Line 68: | ||
*[[Bankruptcy remoteness]] | *[[Bankruptcy remoteness]] | ||
*[[Special purpose vehicle]] | *[[Special purpose vehicle]] | ||
*[[Voidable preference]] | |||
{{ref}} | {{ref}} | ||
{{Technical Tuesday|October 20}} | {{Technical Tuesday|October 20}} | ||