83,035
edits
Litigation lawyer: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
[[Contract]] design should ''avoid'' icebergs. A litigator can only help sort out whose fault it is when one has been ''hit''. | [[Contract]] design should ''avoid'' icebergs. A litigator can only help sort out whose fault it is when one has been ''hit''. | ||
===The good times are a-comin’=== | ===The good times are a-comin’=== | ||
But as the world wakes up to the enormity of war, inflation, stagnation, [[cryptobabble]], tech collapse and the wholesale annihilation of the [[HR|HR woketariat]] by [[Chatbots|GPT-3 chatbots]] | But as the world wakes up to the enormity of war, inflation, stagnation, [[cryptobabble]], tech collapse and the wholesale annihilation of the [[HR|HR woketariat]] — replaced by [[Chatbots|GPT-3 chatbots]] schooled on petabytes of Q-ANON chatter they found on the dark web — look, every cloud has a silver lining, doesn’t it? — we expect litigation to shortly ''roar'' back into fashion. | ||
Redundant regulatory change lawyers: ''now'' would be the time to start swotting up the difference between ''mens rea'' and ''actus reus''. | Redundant regulatory change lawyers: ''now'' would be the time to start swotting up the difference between ''mens rea'' and ''actus reus''. | ||