Lloyds Bank v Independent Insurance: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
No edit summary
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
Line 1: Line 1:
{{a|casenote|[[File: stupid banker.jpg|450px|center|frameless]]]}}{{cite|Lloyds Bank|Independent Insurance|1998|EWCACiv|1853}}
{{a|casenote|[[File: stupid banker.jpg|450px|center|frameless]]}}{{cite|Lloyds Bank|Independent Insurance|1998|EWCACiv|1853}}
===A word about [[pronoun]]s===
===A word about [[pronoun]]s===
A Court of Appeal judge is undoubtedly a guardian of the Queen’s English, and far be it from this snitty little rogue to have an opinion (I mean, can you imagine?), but [[Lord Justice Waller]]’s habit of referring to a corporation as if it were<ref>Note: [[subjunctive]]!</ref> a ''crowd'', and therefore a [[plural]] is ''an abomination''.  
A Court of Appeal judge is undoubtedly a guardian of the Queen’s English, and far be it from this snitty little rogue to have an opinion (I mean, can you imagine?), but [[Lord Justice Waller]]’s habit of referring to a corporation as if it were<ref>Note: [[subjunctive]]!</ref> a ''crowd'', and therefore a [[plural]] is ''an abomination''.