Lloyds Bank v Independent Insurance: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 5: Line 5:
And nor can we put this down to [[wokeness]]: firstly, it was 1998, so ''everyone'' was racist, misogynist and cis-biased etc. etc. etc. — i.e., ''no-one'' was [[woke]] — and secondly, in any case, “bank” takes the neuter pronoun “[[it]]”, so would have been perfectly [[woke]] in the [[singular]] anyway.  
And nor can we put this down to [[wokeness]]: firstly, it was 1998, so ''everyone'' was racist, misogynist and cis-biased etc. etc. etc. — i.e., ''no-one'' was [[woke]] — and secondly, in any case, “bank” takes the neuter pronoun “[[it]]”, so would have been perfectly [[woke]] in the [[singular]] anyway.  


I have re-rendered the Lord Justice’s pronouns as, in my opinion, they ''should'' be.<ref>Yes: like most commercials lawyers I have some kind of obsessive-compulsive disorder, but unusually, also I have appalling attention to detail. This is a cross I have had to bear my whole life.</ref>
I have re-rendered the Lord Justice’s pronouns as, in my opinion, they ''should'' be.<ref>Yes: like most commercial lawyers I have some kind of obsessive-compulsive disorder, but unusually, also I have appalling attention to detail. This is a cross I have had to bear my whole life.</ref>


Right.
Right.
Line 19: Line 19:
There is some confusion to be navigated not only on account of [[Lord Justice Waller]]’s curious facility with [[pronoun]]s, but because ''both'' WFL and Independent had accounts at RBS. WFL was apparently moving its business from RBS to Lloyds. There was a bit of a [[S.N.A.F.U.]] where WFL first sent Independent a [[cheque]] drawn on RBS, which bounced, but this is all a bit of pre-conflict theatre.  
There is some confusion to be navigated not only on account of [[Lord Justice Waller]]’s curious facility with [[pronoun]]s, but because ''both'' WFL and Independent had accounts at RBS. WFL was apparently moving its business from RBS to Lloyds. There was a bit of a [[S.N.A.F.U.]] where WFL first sent Independent a [[cheque]] drawn on RBS, which bounced, but this is all a bit of pre-conflict theatre.  


The meat of the action happened when WFL instructed its new bank, Lloyds, to credit the same amount, £162,387.90, to Indepedent’s RBS account by wire transfer. At the time, Lloyds account only had £982 in it. Lloyds said, “we’ll do it as soon as you put us in [[cleared fund]]s”. Funds were incoming by means of a cheque for £168,000 drawn in WF’s favour by a third part, Kaffco.  
The meat of the action happened when WFL instructed its new bank, Lloyds, to credit the same amount, £162,387.90, to Indepedent’s RBS account by wire transfer. At the time, Lloyds account only had £982 in it. Lloyds said, “we’ll do it as soon as you put us in [[cleared fund]]s”. Funds were incoming by means of a cheque for £168,000 drawn in WFL’s favour by a third part, Kaffco.  


Lloyds credited Kaffco’s cheque to WF’s new account, but marked it as “uncleared funds”, awaiting clearance from Kaffco’s bank.
Lloyds credited Kaffco’s cheque to WFL’s new account, but marked it as “uncleared funds”, awaiting clearance from Kaffco’s bank.


You’ll never guess what happened next.<ref>Not, if you have the same acumen as the average distressed lender in the New York market, at any rate: about 12 of them [[Citigroup v Brigade Capital Management|testified in court]] that they could not imagine in a trillion years, such a thing happening.</ref> Lloyds only went and paid out the £168,000 before the third-party Kaffco cleared by mistake, didn’t it.  
You’ll never guess what happened next.<ref>Not, if you have the same acumen as the average distressed lender in the New York market, at any rate: about 12 of them [[Citigroup v Brigade Capital Management|testified in court]] that they could not imagine in a trillion years, such a thing happening.</ref> Lloyds only went and paid out the £168,000 before the third-party Kaffco cleared by mistake, didn’t it.  


And you’ll never guess what happened after that: the Kaffco cheque bounced. ''Whoops''. Lloyds put WF’s account into overdraft, but in the meantime, asked Independent for the money back.  
And you’ll never guess what happened after that: the Kaffco cheque bounced. ''Whoops''. Lloyds put WFL’s account into overdraft, but in the meantime, asked Independent for the money back.  


===Issues===
===Issues===