Look, I tried: Difference between revisions

1,004 bytes added ,  19 November 2019
no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 4: Line 4:


Now each of these intermediaries need to agree the terms on which the parcel passes. Their main concern is that they get enough of a handle on the asset for long enough to have a good bite before they pass it on, but each needs also to prepare for the consequences of the parcel not, eventually coming back to them when their immediate client — in most cases the person who passed the parcel to them — decides to ask for it back.
Now each of these intermediaries need to agree the terms on which the parcel passes. Their main concern is that they get enough of a handle on the asset for long enough to have a good bite before they pass it on, but each needs also to prepare for the consequences of the parcel not, eventually coming back to them when their immediate client — in most cases the person who passed the parcel to them — decides to ask for it back.
Now the ultimate client might be a credulous old fool with a chip shop by the lighthouse in Dungeness, but the Russian doll assembly of agents through whose intestinal systems his pitiful savings have passed are not. Each has its own team of assiduous [[legal eagle]]s, and each will want ever higher standards of prudence from their onward counterparties — one has to do something to earn one’s commission after all. And so commences an arms race of covenants, representations and warranties. It will get to a point where the legal eagle handling the incoming blanches — the request exceeds all policies and internal procedures. It cannot be done.
:“I ... I ... we cannot agree to monitor every individual employee’s personal investments to comply with your [[environmental, social and corporate governance]] policy,” she will wail. “But it is absurd!”
:“But you must,” will come the reply. “For it is in our charter. We have committed to our clients. This is a show-stopper.”


{{sa}}
{{sa}}