Luxembourg limited partnership: Difference between revisions

← Older edit

Luxembourg limited partnership (view source)

Revision as of 10:55, 2 February 2015

428 bytes added , 2 February 2015

no edit summary

Amwelladmin

Bureaucrats, Interface administrators, Administrators

82,891

edits

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+===Partnerships created by the Companies Law===
 The {{tag|Luxembourg}} law on commercial companies of 10 August 1915 (the “Companies Law”) until recently recognized only two forms of limited partnership, each of these having a separate legal personality:
 *The '''corporate partnership limited by shares''' (''[[société en commandite par actions]]'' or “{{tag|SCA}}”), which is a joint-stock company whose capital is represented by shares in principle freely transferable; and
 *The '''common limited partnership''' (''[[société en commandite simple]]'' or “{{tag|SCS}}”), which is an “''intuitu personae''” company issuing limited partnership interests that in general are not freely transferable.
-The Luxembourg law of 12 July 2013 on alternative investment fund managers (the “{{tag|AIFMD}} Law”) transposing the {{tag|AIFMD}} into {{tag|Luxembourg}} law amends the SCS regime and introduces a third form of limited partnership into the Companies Law:
+===Partnerships created by the AIFMD Law===
-*The '''special limited partnership''' (''[[société en commandite spéciale]]'' or “{{tag|SCSp}}”).
+The Luxembourg law of 12 July 2013 on alternative investment fund managers (the “{{tag|AIFMD}} Law”) transposing the {{tag|AIFMD}} into {{tag|Luxembourg}} law amends the {{tag|SCS}} regime and introduces a third form of limited partnership into the Companies Law:
+*The '''special limited partnership''' (''[[société en commandite spéciale]]'' or “{{tag|SCSp}}”). Unlike the [[SCS]] and [[SCA]], which both are ''intuitu personae'' entities, the {{tag|SCSp}} has no legal personality distinct from its partners, and may have a different treatment therefore for {{tag|netting}} purposes (in otherwords, check your opinion to make sure it covers an {{tag|SCSp}}).
-SCS and SCSp are ''intuitu personae'' entities. However, the SCSp has no legal personality distinct from its partners.
+Whereas assets contributed to the {{tag|SCS}} are owned by the {{tag|SCS}} itself, assets contributed to an {{tag|SCSp}} are owned by its partners, but the Companies Law explicitly provides that they can be recorded in the name of the {{tag|SCSp}}, and those assets can only satisfy claims in relation to the creation, conduct or dissolution of the {{tag|SCSp}}. As a result:
+*A creditor with a personal claim against a partner of an SCSp cannot make a claim against assets owned by that partner that are attributable to the {{tag|SCSp}}.
-*Assets contributed to the SCS are owned by the SCS.
+*The {{tag|SCSp}} will have its own creditors and may be entitled under the partnership agreement to borrow for its own account. Despite the absence of a legal personality, the {{tag|SCSp}} benefits from other features generally attached to the legal personality – for example, it has its own registered office and it can sue and be sued. But check that  you have a close out netting opinion in place. (Did I already say that?)
-*Assets contributed to the SCSp are owned by its partners, but the Companies Law explicitly provides that assets can be recorded in the name of the SCSp, and those assets can only satisfy claims in relation to the creation, conduct or dissolution of the SCSp.
-:*As a result, a creditor with a personal claim against one of the partners of the SCSp cannot make a claim against the portion of the assets owned by that partner in the SCSp.
-:*The SCSp will have its own creditors and may be entitled under the partnership agreement to borrow for its own account. Despite the absence of a legal personality, the SCSp benefits from other features generally attached to the legal personality – for example, it has its own registered office and it can sue and be sued.