Mansuetae naturae: Difference between revisions

← Older edit

Mansuetae naturae (view source)

Revision as of 12:54, 5 January 2021

1,078 bytes added , 5 January 2021

no edit summary

Amwelladmin

Bureaucrats, Interface administrators, Administrators

82,882

edits

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-In {{tag|Latin}}, “by its nature, tame”.
+{{a|latin|}}Of an [[animal]],<ref>or deliberately collected body of water: see {{casenote|Rylands|Fletcher}}.</ref> “by its nature, ''tame''”. From the {{tag|Latin}}.
-An animal of a type generally considered to be domesticated, gentle, tame, and therefore more apt to serve (or be eaten by) than to attack (or eat) its master.
+An [[animal]] of a type generally considered to be domesticated, gentle, tame, and therefore more apt to serve (or be eaten by) than to attack (or eat) its [[master]].
-Dogs, (domestic) cats, cows, geese, hamsters: these are [[mansuetae naturae]]. If such a beast causes one’s neighbor an injury, its master will only be liable if {{sex|he}} knew that the beast and a nasty streak — in {{casenote|Rex|Huggins}} the beast in question was a beagle with no such known streak, and to recover the dry-cleaning bill, Mr. Huggins was forced to proceed against Rex directly.
+Dogs, (domestic) cats, cows, geese, hamsters: these are [[mansuetae naturae]]. If such a beast causes one’s [[neighbour]] an injury, its [[master]] will only be liable if {{sex|he}} knew<ref>Or ''ought to'' have known? Not clear.</ref> that the [[animal|beast]] had a tendency to engage in the sort of perfidious behaviour which ultimately befell the [[plaintiff]] — in {{casenote|Rex|Huggins}} the mutt in question was an elderly beagle with no known history of incontinence.  His master not being liable, to recover the dry-cleaning bill, Mr. Huggins joined Rex to the action. The action succeeded at first instance but was overruled on appeal.
-To be contrasted with animals ''[[ferae naturae]]''. Like Scots terriers.
+'''''Held''''', had Rex been a [[tiger]], or a [[scots terrier]], it might have succeeded. A similar action was found in {{casenote1|In Re Bassett}} about a flatulent bloodhound who was partial to Scotch eggs.
-{{plainenglish}}
+A water reservoir is, in the eyes of the law,<ref>{{casenote|Rylands|Fletcher}}, again.</ref> a sort of [[domesticated animal]] with a known predisposition to leak on things. A bloodhound with a weakness for meat-covered eggs is a [[domesticated animal]] with a tendency to fart on things.
-{{C|Tort|Latin}}
+[[Chicken Licken]] is a domesticated animal with a known predisposition to drafting impenetrable [[disclaimers]].
+{{sa}}
+To be contrasted with ''wild'' animals ''[[ferae naturae]]''<ref>Like [[lion]]s, [[tiger]]s and Scots terriers.</ref>.
+*{{casenote1|In Re Bassett}}
+{{ref}}
+{{C3|Tort|Latin|Egg}}