Memorandum of understanding: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
(Created page with "{{a|contract|}}{{d|{{PAGENAME}}|/ˌmɛməˈrændəm ɒv ˌʌndəˈstændɪŋ/|Also, an '''''MOU''''') (n}} A posh — and gender appropriate — way of saying a “...")
 
No edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{a|contract|}}{{d|{{PAGENAME}}|/ˌmɛməˈrændəm ɒv ˌʌndəˈstændɪŋ/|Also, an '''''[[MOU]]''''') (n}}
{{a|contract|}}{{d|{{PAGENAME}}|/ˌmɛməˈrændəm ɒv ˌʌndəˈstændɪŋ/|Also, an [[MOU]]) (n}}


A posh — and [[gender]] appropriate — way of saying a “[[gentlemen’s agreement]].”
A posh — and [[gender]] appropriate — way of saying a “[[gentlemen’s agreement]].”


A lawyer will tell you — is '' bound'' to tell you, with an existential shudder, that [[MOU]]s aren’t worth the paper they are written on, but lawyers operate in general structural defiance of the [[commercial imperative]], so who cares what they think. And while it is generally, true, this is also true in a bigger picture sense of any contract, however legally binding in theory, with a commercial value less than about £10 million, since the cost of enforcing it means no-one in possession of sound mind and competent legal advice would launch legal action for a sum smaller than that.
A lawyer will tell you — is '' bound'' to tell you, with an existential shudder, that [[MOU]]s aren’t worth the paper they are written on, but lawyers operate in general structural defiance of the [[commercial imperative]], so who cares what they think.  
 
And while it is generally true this is also true, in a bigger picture sense, of any [[contract]] with a commercial value less than about £10 million, however legally binding in theory, since the cost of enforcing it means no-one in possession of sound mind and competent legal advice would launch legal action for a sum smaller than that.


{{sa}}
{{sa}}
*[[Commercial imperative]]
*[[Commercial imperative]]