Misrepresentation - ISDA Provision: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{isdaanat|5(a)(iv)}}
{{isdaanat|5(a)(iv)}}
What is a “[[material]]” respect? This is key, since some of the general representations ({{isdaprov|Consents}}, for example) are quite wide, and in this world of regulatory perma-change, the risk that one is, for example, outside technical compliance with a new regulation as it is implemented, notwithstanding a competent [[regulator]]’s informal indication that no action will be taken if you get your skates on and remediate quickly — it happened for {{t|MiFID II}} as thousands of financial firms raced headlong at the brick wall of that 3 January 2017 implementation date<ref>[[Swiss stay]] too, for that matter.</ref> but it seems reasonable to suppose that materially must somehow impact your ability to carry out your obligations under a Transaction or the {{isdama}}<ref>Other than the representation itself, of course. That would be meta, and actually a bit of a [[strange loop]].</ref>.
What is a “[[material]]” respect? This is key, since some of the general representations ({{isdaprov|Consents}}, for example) are quite wide, and in this world of regulatory perma-change, the risk that one is, for example, outside technical compliance with a new regulation as it is implemented, notwithstanding a competent [[regulator]]’s informal indication that no action will be taken if you get your skates on and remediate quickly — it happened for {{t|MiFID II}} as thousands of financial firms raced headlong at the brick wall of that 3 January 2017 implementation date<ref>[[Swiss stay]] too, for that matter.</ref> but it seems reasonable to suppose that materially must somehow impact your ability to carry out your obligations under a Transaction or the {{isdama}}<ref>Other than the representation itself, of course. That would be meta, and actually a bit of a [[strange loop]].</ref>.
{{sa}}
*{{isdaprov|Consents}}
{{ref}}