82,891
edits
Nemo dat quod non habet: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| (5 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
“No-one can give what he does not have.” | {{a|latin|}}''“No-one can give what he does not have.”'' <br /> | ||
''“You can only give as good as you get”''<br /> | |||
A [[Latin]] maxim of relevance to assignees and purchasers for value, which was roundly ignored by whoever the bright spark was who came up with the preposterous idea of [[rehypothecation]]. | A [[Latin]] maxim of relevance to assignees and purchasers for value, which was roundly ignored by whoever the bright spark was who came up with the preposterous idea of [[rehypothecation]]. | ||
It helps explain why having a right to assign transactioins under an {{isdama}}, even to someone in a shady jurisdiction, won’t interfere with your [[close-out netting|close out netting]] | |||
It is also useful in deflating drafting pretensions of people who come bearing gifts like “[[nor anyone acting on its behalf]]”. | |||
{{sa}} | |||
*[[Delegation]] | |||
*[[Set-off]] | *[[Set-off]] | ||
*[[Netting]] | *[[Netting]] | ||
| Line 9: | Line 15: | ||
*[[Rehypothecation]] | *[[Rehypothecation]] | ||
{{c|Latin}} | {{c|Latin maxims}} | ||