Netting manifesto: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{a|devil|}}
{{a|devil|}}To qualify for [[Regulatory capital|capital relief]] for [[netting]] and collateral arrangements built into [[master trading agreement]]s, a [[dealer]] must have reasoned [[legal opinion]]s that give a clear answer as to whether netting would be enforceable in each jurisdiction for each master agreement and for each counterparty type with whom it trades.  
===You need opinions===
To qualify for [[Regulatory capital|capital relief]] for [[netting]] and collateral arrangements built into [[master trading agreement]]s, a [[dealer]] must have reasoned [[legal opinion]]s that give a clear answer as to whether netting would be enforceable in each jurisdiction for each master agreement and for each counterparty type with whom it trades.  
Traditionally, each [[industry association]] has obtained [[netting opinion]]s for its own [[master agreement]] in main jurisdictions and for main counterparty types:
Traditionally, each [[industry association]] has obtained [[netting opinion]]s for its own [[master agreement]] in main jurisdictions and for main counterparty types:
*[[ISDA]] for the {{isdama}} and [[credit support annex]]es
*[[ISDA]] for the {{isdama}} and [[credit support annex]]es