No oral amendment: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(10 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
“'''[[No oral modification]]'''”. A self-contradictory stricture on an [[amendment agreement]], until 2018 understood by all to be silly fluff put in a contract to appease the lawyers.
{{boileranat|No oral amendment|}}{{no oral modification capsule}}
===The ''[[Rock Advertising Limited v MWB Business Exchange Centres Limited - Case Note|Rock Advertising]]'' case===
{{rock advertising}}
===Regulations: more unintended consequences===
The JC’s friends, relations, countrypersons and [[LinkedIn]] combatants don’t all agree that no [[oral modification]] clauses are potty as he does — but ''that’s what being a contrarian is all about''.


No longer, as it ought to be, an entirely vacuous piece of legal flannel — courtesy of an entirely vacuous piece of legal reasoning by no less an eminence than Lord Sumption of the Supreme Court in {{Casenote|Rock Advertising Limited|MWB Business Exchange Centres Limited}}.
{{sa}}
 
{{seealso}}
*[[Amendment]]
*[[Amendment]]
*{{Casenote|Rock Advertising Limited|MWB Business Exchange Centres Limited}}
*{{Casenote|Rock Advertising Limited|MWB Business Exchange Centres Limited}}