82,891
edits
No reuse of assets by depositary - UCITS V Provision: Difference between revisions
No reuse of assets by depositary - UCITS V Provision (view source)
Revision as of 11:13, 27 September 2019
, 27 September 2019no edit summary
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
The famous rule which rules out [[PB]] style [[rehypothecation]] for [[UCITS V|UCITS 5]] funds. | The famous rule which rules out [[PB]] style [[rehypothecation]] for [[UCITS V|UCITS 5]] funds. | ||
===But I can still [[rehypothecate]] up to 100% of a {{tag|UCITS}} fund’s [[indebtedness]], right? ''Right?''=== | ===But I can still [[rehypothecate]] up to 100% of a {{tag|UCITS}} fund’s [[indebtedness]], right? ''Right?''=== | ||
I mean, the fund ''owes'' me, man. It ''owes'' me. | Wrong. | ||
But, I mean, the fund ''owes'' me, man. It ''owes'' me. | |||
Expect optimistic [[prime brokerage]] [[sales]]folk to argue that the limited exception will cover PB rephypothecation as long as the PB limits itself to 100% of the fund’s [[indebtedness]]. Alas, this is wishful thinking. The permitted exception to the bar on reuse is designed to allow {{tag|UCITS}} funds to participate in fully collateralised [[Agent lender|agent lending]] programmes. In that case a custodian lends client assets into the market on the client’s behalf (and as its [[agent]]) to earn a positive additional return for the fund. This is a very different thing to allowing a prime broker to play with the fund’s assets to defray its own financing costs from its margin lending on those very assets. To wit: | Expect optimistic [[prime brokerage]] [[sales]]folk to argue that the limited exception will cover PB rephypothecation as long as the PB limits itself to 100% of the fund’s [[indebtedness]]. Alas, this is wishful thinking. The permitted exception to the bar on reuse is designed to allow {{tag|UCITS}} funds to participate in fully collateralised [[Agent lender|agent lending]] programmes. In that case a custodian lends client assets into the market on the client’s behalf (and as its [[agent]]) to earn a positive additional return for the fund. This is a very different thing to allowing a prime broker to play with the fund’s assets to defray its own financing costs from its margin lending on those very assets. To wit: | ||