|
|
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| {{isdaanat|Non-affected Party}} | | {{manual|MI|2002|Non-affected Party|Section|Non-affected Party|medium}} |
| A clause so joyously well-crafted in 1992, that the ISDA boxwallahs saw no need to change it a decade later, when the opportunity presented itself. They might have grasped it to devise a concept less clumsy than “the {{isdaprov|Non-affected Party}} or the {{isdaprov|Non-defaulting Party}}, as the case may be”, but that’s just me.
| |
| | |
| | |
| {{Seealso}}
| |
| *{{isdaprov|Affected Party}}
| |
| *{{isdaprov|Defaulting Party}}
| |
| *{{isdaprov|Non-defaulting Party}}
| |