Normal Accidents: Living with High-Risk Technologies: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
Line 1: Line 1:
{{a|systems|[[File:Erebus.gif|450px|frameless|center|Air New Zealand Flight TE901]]
{{a|systems|{{Erebus|gif|Air New Zealand Flight TE901}}}}{{quote|'''[[Accident]]''' /ˈaksɪd(ə)nt/ ''(n).'' <br>
}}{{quote|'''[[Accident]]''' /ˈaksɪd(ə)nt/ ''(n).'' <br>


An inevitable occurrence due to the action of immutable laws.
An inevitable occurrence due to the action of immutable laws.
Line 56: Line 55:
===When Kramer hears about this ...===
===When Kramer hears about this ...===
[[File:Shit hits fan.jpg|300px|thumb|right|Kramer hearing about this, yesterday.]]
[[File:Shit hits fan.jpg|300px|thumb|right|Kramer hearing about this, yesterday.]]
So far, so hoopy; but here’s the rub: we can make our systems less complex and ''reduce'' [[tight coupling]] by careful design, functional redundancy and iterative improvement — air transport has become progressively safer as it has developed: it has learned from each accident — but, as long as it is a complex system with the scope for complex interaction, ''we cannot eliminate [[system accident]]s altogether''. They are, as coders like to joke, a feature, not a bug.  
So far, so hoopy; but here’s the rub: we can make our systems less complex and ''reduce'' [[tight coupling]] by careful design, functional redundancy and iterative improvement — [[air crash|air transport has become progressively safer]] as it has developed: it has learned from each accident — but, as long as it is a complex system with the scope for complex interaction, ''we cannot eliminate [[system accident]]s altogether''. They are, as coders like to joke, a feature, not a bug.  


Furthermore, in our efforts to pre-solve for catastrophe, we tend ''not'' to simplify, but to complicate: we add prepackaged “risk mitigation” components: [[Policy|policies]], [[taxonomy|taxonomies]], [[key performance indicator]]s, [[tick-boxes]], [[dialog box]]es, [[bloatware]] processes, rules, and [[Chatbot|new-fangled bits of kit]] to the process ''in the name of programmatic risk management''.  
Furthermore, in our efforts to pre-solve for catastrophe, we tend ''not'' to simplify, but to complicate: we add prepackaged “risk mitigation” components: [[Policy|policies]], [[taxonomy|taxonomies]], [[key performance indicator]]s, [[tick-boxes]], [[dialog box]]es, [[bloatware]] processes, rules, and [[Chatbot|new-fangled bits of kit]] to the process ''in the name of programmatic risk management''.