82,891
edits
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{a|negotiation|}}In layperson’s terms a [[novation]] is the transfer in full of one party’s rights and obligations under a {{t|contract}} to another person. The '''transferor''' steps out of the contract and is no longer bound by it. The '''transferee''' steps in to the contract and assumes all the transferor’s obligations. The '''remaining party''' stays put, but must perform to, and may expect performance from, the transferee and not the transferor. | {{a|negotiation| | ||
[[File:Penrose-dreieck.svg|450px|thumb|center|An [[assignment and assumption]] agreement yesterday]] | |||
}}In layperson’s terms a [[novation]] is the transfer in full of one party’s rights and obligations under a {{t|contract}} to another person. The '''transferor''' steps out of the contract and is no longer bound by it. The '''transferee''' steps in to the contract and assumes all the transferor’s obligations. The '''remaining party''' stays put, but must perform to, and may expect performance from, the transferee and not the transferor. | |||
===Bizarre love triangle=== | ===Bizarre love triangle=== | ||
Unlike an [[assignment]], a [[novation]] requires all three parties to agree. A party to an [[English law]] {{t|contract}} may “[[assign]]” its ''[[right]]s'' to a third person without its counterparty’s permission (as long as the contract does not forbid it); however, it cannot unilaterally assign its '''[[obligation|obligations]]'''. | Unlike an [[assignment]], a [[novation]] requires all three parties to agree. A party to an [[English law]] {{t|contract}} may “[[assign]]” its ''[[right]]s'' to a third person without its counterparty’s permission (as long as the contract does not forbid it); however, it cannot unilaterally assign its '''[[obligation|obligations]]'''. | ||
Line 14: | Line 16: | ||
Whether this is true or not is a matter for local [[tax attorney]]s — fools rush in where ''they'' fear to tread — but, the [[battle of form and substance|battle of form over substance]] being what it is, you would like to think one could mount a sensible argument that seeing as a fund’s net market exposure before and after a [[novation]] doesn’t change, the novation should be tax neutral, but — [[chicken licken]] and all that. | Whether this is true or not is a matter for local [[tax attorney]]s — fools rush in where ''they'' fear to tread — but, the [[battle of form and substance|battle of form over substance]] being what it is, you would like to think one could mount a sensible argument that seeing as a fund’s net market exposure before and after a [[novation]] doesn’t change, the novation should be tax neutral, but — [[chicken licken]] and all that. | ||
Anyhow, one hopeful — but, to these cynical eyes, foolish — solution is to document the transfer not as a novation but an “[[assignment and assumption]]” | Anyhow, one hopeful — but, to these cynical eyes, foolish — solution is to document the transfer not as a novation but an “[[assignment and assumption]]”. | ||
{{assignment and assumption capsule}} | |||
===Trick for young players=== | ===Trick for young players=== | ||
This is where one where unless you are careful, you may need to rely, more heavily that you would like, on the [[legal eagle]]’s old friend [[mutatis mutandis]]. | This is where one where unless you are careful, you may need to rely, more heavily that you would like, on the [[legal eagle]]’s old friend [[mutatis mutandis]]. |