|
|
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| {{fullanat|aifmd|DR79|}} | | {{fullanat|aifmd|DR76|}} |
| An objective reason is used un {{aifmdprov|21(11)}} as the grounds for delegating safekeeping functions of a {{aifmdprov|depositary}}. What this means discussed in the recital to the [[AIFMD Delegated Regulation]] (sigh): | | An objective reason is used un {{aifmdprov|21(11)}} as the grounds for delegating safekeeping functions of a {{aifmdprov|depositary}}. What this means discussed in the recital to the [[AIFMD Delegated Regulation]] (sigh): |
|
| |
|
| (121) A depositary is allowed under certain circumstances to discharge itself of liability for the loss of financial instruments held in custody by a third party to which custody was delegated. For such liability discharge to be permitted '''''there must be an objective reason for contracting such discharge that is accepted by both the depositary and the AIF or the AIFM acting on behalf of the AIF'''''. An objective reason should be established for each discharge of liability taking into account the concrete circumstances in which custody has been delegated.
| | {{aifmd DR delegation explanation}} |
| | |
| (122) When considering an objective reason, the right balance should be established to ensure that the contractual discharge can be effectively relied upon if needed and that sufficient safeguards are put in place to avoid any misuse of the contractual discharge of liability by the depositary. The contractual discharge of liability should under no circumstances be used to circumvent the depositary’s liability requirements under Directive 2011/61/EU. '''''The depositary should demonstrate that it was forced by the specific circumstances to delegate custody to a third party. Contracting a discharge should be always in the best interest of the AIF or its investors, and the AIF or the AIFM acting on behalf of the AIF should make it explicit that they act in such best interest.''''' Examples of scenarios should indicate the situations where a depositary may be considered as not having other options but to delegate custody to third parties.
| |