Obligated: Difference between revisions

413 bytes added ,  31 December 2019
no edit summary
(Created page with " “Obligated” is only a word if you have some kind of aversion to verbs: It is a {{tag|verb}}, inevitably used in the passive (I am ''obliged'') that was then nom...")
 
No edit summary
 
(8 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
“[[Obligated]]” is only a word if you have some kind of aversion to verbs: It is a {{tag|verb}}, inevitably used in the passive (I am ''[[obliged]]'') that was then [[nominalisation|nominalised]] into a {{tag|noun}} (I am subject to an ''obligation'') and then inexpertly converted {{isdaprov|back}} to a {{tag|verb}} again (I am ''[[obligated]]''). There's a better, active, English verb: “[[must]]”.
{{pe}}“[[Obligated]]” is only a word if you have an aversion to verbs: It started out life as a {{tag|verb}}. [[Mediocre lawyer|Fastidious draftspeople]] inevitably put it into the {{tag|passive}} (I am ''[[obliged]]''), brusquely [[nominalisation|nominalised]] it into a {{tag|noun}} (I am subject to an ''obligation'') and then inexpertly retrofitted it ''back'' to a {{tag|verb}} again, ''still'' in the passive: (I am ''[[obligated]]'').  
 
For a ninja trick put it in the [[future perfect]] [[passive]]: “I shall have been obligated”.
 
There's a better, active, English verb: “[[must]]” which, if you are to find favour with people like [[Amwell J|me]], you shall be obligated to [[effect]] the deployment [[of]].
 
{{sa}}
*The [[future perfect]]’s not what it used to be expected to be going to have been.