Operationalisation: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{A|Technology|}}The [[management consultancy]] dogma which sees and lovingly embraces a dystopian future in which the machines take over, and is hell bent on getting them to take over now.
{{A|Technology|}}The [[management consultancy]] {{t|dogma}} which sees and lovingly embraces a dystopian future in which the machines take over, and is hell bent on getting them to take over now.


The good news, long term, is that the idea is profoundly flawed and that machines are ''not'' going to take over. The bad news, short term, is that this will not become apparent for a long time yet, in the mean time large organisations are run by people ''like'' [[Rumours of our demise are greatly exaggerated - technology article|John Cryan]]<ref>Though not ''actually'' John Cryan, of course, any more.</ref>, and many good people will be disenfranchised and driven up the wall in the mean time.
The good news, long term, is that the idea is profoundly flawed and that machines are ''not'' going to take over. The bad news, short term, is that this will not become apparent for a long time yet, in the mean time large organisations are run by people ''like'' [[Rumours of our demise are greatly exaggerated - technology article|John Cryan]]<ref>Though not ''actually'' John Cryan, of course, any more.</ref>, and many good people will be disenfranchised and driven up the wall in the meantime.


{{seealso}}
{{sa}}
*[[Playbook]]
*[[Playbook]]
*[[Runbook]]
*[[Runbook]]