Orally or in writing: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 4: Line 4:
:::''Code of Federal Regulations of the United States (Port and Waterways Authorities) - 1976''  
:::''Code of Federal Regulations of the United States (Port and Waterways Authorities) - 1976''  


This trope is all the more irksome for ''not'' being the statement of the bleeding obvious it means to be. For, “[[orally or in writing]]” omits a whole ecosystem of ''non''-[[ verbal]] communications — nods, wags, shaken heads, facial tics and cocked eyebrows of the kind on which Roger Moore built an entire career — which can convey [[offer]], [[acceptance]] and [[consideration]] (and for that matter ''re''consideration) just as well can a written or oral communication.
This trope is all the more irksome for ''not'' being the statement of the bleeding obvious it means to be. For, “[[orally or in writing]]” omits a whole ecosystem of ''non''-[[ verbal]] communications — winks, nods, wags, shaken heads, facial tics and cocked eyebrows of the kind on which Roger Moore built an entire career, and of course smoke signals, psople standing on hills and communicating by semaphore, Greek heroes miscommunicating their safe return by sail colour or more recent naval types who like to transmit their instructions by means of a string of flags. Any of these can convey [[offer]], [[acceptance]] and [[consideration]] (and for that matter ''re''consideration) just as well can a written or oral communication.


In the mean time, having considered your request, to comply with his regulatory obligations your Waterways Inspection Official must do more than nod or shake his head - but poking out of a tongue<ref>Unless the W.I.O. in question is speaking on a telephone or behind an opaque screen at the time, of course</ref> or blowing a raspberry may be sufficient<ref>{{casenote|Shubtill|Port Authority of Finchley}}</ref>.
In the mean time, having considered your request, to comply with his regulatory obligations your Waterways Inspection Official must do more than nod or shake his head - but poking out of a tongue<ref>Unless the W.I.O. in question is speaking on a telephone or behind an opaque screen at the time, of course</ref> or blowing a raspberry may be sufficient<ref>{{casenote|Shubtill|Port Authority of Finchley}}</ref>.
Line 13: Line 13:
In the context of [[confidentiality agreement]], including oral information is a big no-no: see {{confiprov|Confidential information}}, and [[Talk:Confidential information - Confi Provision‎‎|suggested rebuttal]].
In the context of [[confidentiality agreement]], including oral information is a big no-no: see {{confiprov|Confidential information}}, and [[Talk:Confidential information - Confi Provision‎‎|suggested rebuttal]].
{{sa}}
{{sa}}
*[[In writing]]
*[[Confi Anatomy]]
*[[Confi Anatomy]]
*[[Verbal]]
*[[Verbal]]
*[[Oral]]
*[[Oral]]
{{ref}}
{{ref}}