Org chart: Difference between revisions

64 bytes added ,  24 February 2022
no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 5: Line 5:
{{quote|“What you see is all there is.”
{{quote|“What you see is all there is.”
:— {{author|Daniel Kahneman}}}}
:— {{author|Daniel Kahneman}}}}
{{quote|“Der Teufel steckt im Detail. Gott ist in den Lücken.”<ref>''The Devil is in the detail. God is in the gaps''.</ref>
{{quote|“Der Teufel mag im Detail stecken, aber Gott steckt in den Lücken.”<ref>''The Devil may be in the detail, but God is in the gaps''.</ref>
:—{{Buchstein}}, ''[[Die Schweizer Heulsuse]]''}}
:—{{Buchstein}}, ''[[Die Schweizer Heulsuse]]''}}


Because we can see [[form]] easily, we imbue it with meaning. We assume static connections between vertices on the formal architecture matter: that they are “structural”, because they ''say'' they are.  
Because we can see [[form]] easily, we imbue it with meaning. We assume the fixed connections we draw between vertices on the matter: that they are “structural”, because we ''say'' they are.  


Take the [[org chart]]: this places every person in a firm in a logical, hierarchical relationship to everyone else, and can be neatly and easily controlled, that’s not to say many organisation charts become positively Byzantine.
Take the [[org chart]]: which places every person in a firm in a logical, hierarchical relationship to everyone else, can be neatly and easily controlled, and implies that these supply-lines, chains of command and communication channels are the ones that matter. But do they? aren’t


There is much management theory around the relationship of “spans” and “layers”<ref>[https://www.google.com/search?q=spans+and+layers Let me google that for you].</ref> optimal organisation charts no more than 5 layers of management; no more than 5 direct reports and so on. This, from [https://peoplepuzzles.co.uk/news/ive-got-too-many-direct-reports/#:~:text=Around%20five%20direct%20reports%20seems,really%20hold%20the%20business%20back People Puzzles], is pretty funny:
There is much management theory around the relationship of “spans” and “layers”<ref>[https://www.google.com/search?q=spans+and+layers Let me google that for you].</ref> optimal organisation charts no more than 5 layers of management; no more than 5 direct reports and so on. This, from [https://peoplepuzzles.co.uk/news/ive-got-too-many-direct-reports/#:~:text=Around%20five%20direct%20reports%20seems,really%20hold%20the%20business%20back People Puzzles], is pretty funny: