Paradox: Difference between revisions

482 bytes added ,  11 March 2021
no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{a|work|[[File:Paradox.png|550px|frameless|center]]<small>{{catbox|Paradox|Metaphysics|Cosmology}}</small>}}The universe is not a rational place. If it were, the [[middle management]] layer would long since have solved it, [[Reductionism|reduced]] it to atoms, reconstructed it into an binary model, devised the [[algorithm]] that will handle the [[known known]]s for the single causal chain that definitively stretches from now to the finite hereafter — it is a consequence of reductionism being true that there ''is'' an ultimate fate of the universe — and therefore have done away with we [[Meatsack|cantankerous sacks of mortal flesh]], allowing us the leisure time [[technological unemployment]] always promised us, so we could contemplate in richl specific detail the exact unfolding of the onrushing apocalypse, into whose loving maw we are categorically and unavoidably hurtling. There will be no more [[known unknown]]s, [[unknown unknown]]s or even [[unknown known]]s.  
{{a|work|[[File:Paradox.png|550px|frameless|center]]<small>{{catbox|Paradox|Metaphysics|Cosmology}}</small>}}The universe is not a rational place.  


Some people find this exciting. Personally, I find it desolate.
If it were, the [[middle management]] layer would long since have solved it, [[Reductionism|reduced]] it to atoms, reconstructed it into an binary model, devised the [[algorithm]] that will handle the [[known known]]s for the single [[Causation|causal chain]] that definitively stretches from now to the finite hereafter — it is a consequence of [[reductionism]] being true that there ''is'' a single ultimate fate of the universe, and a unique pathway there — and therefore will have finally done away with we [[Meatsack|cantankerous sacks of mortal flesh]], allowing us the unlimited leisure our [[technological unemployment]] always promised us, so we could watch, in rich, ultra-high resolution detail, the exact unfolding of the onrushing apocalypse, into whose loving maw we are already categorically and unavoidably hurtling.  


But — alas: [[reductionism]] is nonsense; the universe cannot be solved; we are stuck with these persistently irrational artefacts in every day life. I can’t even figure out what to have for lunch.  
Reductionism means ''we are solved''. There are no mysteries, no paradoxes; all unknowns will be known, and [[known unknown]]s, [[unknown unknown]]s or even [[unknown known]]s the empty set.  


Now, if the price for metaphysical freedom is having to deal with stupid things like [[non-fungible token]]s, [[rehypothecation]] and [[performance appraisal]], then dammit, I’m buying, since the same ticket also grants us each a permanent, irrevocable [[licence]] to redesign our own private narratives to take ourselves wherever we damn well please. This is mine; readers. You can take it or leave it.
Some people find this exciting. Personally, I find it desolate, but only the very limited extent it is even ''coherent''.


So it is with fondness and gratitude that we catalogue just a few of the potty things with which we must deal on any day — see the boxes on the right. These things may drive us insane, they may make no sense at all, but since they vouchsafe our individuality and our belief in personal freedom and they’re cheaper than a snakeskin jacket, they will do for me.
But — it is my unalloyed joy to declare, my friends: [[reductionism]] is nonsense; the cosmos ''cannot'' be solved; we are stuck with our grim, jury-rigged, provisional existence, rammed full as it is of the persistently irrational artefacts we know as ''everyday life''. Right now I can’t even figure out what to have for ''lunch'', for God’s sake. And that’s a good thing.
 
Now, if the price of this metaphysical freedom is having endure stupidities like [[non-fungible token]]s, [[rehypothecation]] and [[performance appraisal]]s, then dammit, I’m buying, since that same ticket also grants us a permanent, non-transferable, irrevocable [[licence]] to redesign our own private [[narrative|narratives]] to take ourselves ''wherever we damn well please''. This is mine; readers. You can take it or leave it.
 
So it is with fondness and gratitude that we catalogue just a few of the potty things with which we must deal on any day — see the “paradox” box on the right. These things may drive us insane, they may make no sense at all, but since they vouchsafe our individuality and our belief in personal freedom and they’re cheaper than a snakeskin jacket they will do for me.


{{Sa}}
{{Sa}}
*[[Reductionism]]
*[[Reductionism]]
*[[Rumsfeld’s taxonomy]]
*[[Rumsfeld’s taxonomy]]