Parol evidence: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
(Created page with "An old fashioned idea that once a contract is reduced to writing, any other evidence of the parties’ agreement or intentions must be ignored: in many ways a companion piece...")
 
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
An old fashioned idea that once a contract is reduced to writing, any other evidence of the parties’ agreement or intentions must be ignored: in many ways a companion piece to the equally fusty “[[no oral modification]]” rule, which in the hands of well meaning commercial judges is enjoying a bit of an indian summer.  In practice there are exceptions, and you will usually need at least an entire agreement clause, unless your contract is of the sort that is required by law to be in writing.
{{g}}An old-fashioned idea that once a [[contract]] is reduced to writing, any other evidence of the parties’ agreement or intentions must be ignored: in many ways a companion piece to the equally fusty “[[no oral modification]]” rule, which in the hands of well-meaning but misguided commercial judges has been enjoying a bit of an Indian summer as of late.  In practice there ''are'' exceptions — the common law of equity is basically one big exception — and you will usually need at least an [[entire agreement]] clause, unless your [[contract]] is of the sort that is required by law to be in writing.<ref>such as a contract for the conveyance of land.</ref>


 
{{contract vs document}}
 
{{course of dealing vs waiver}}
{{seealso}}
{{sa}}
*[[No oral modification]]
*[[No oral modification]]
*[[Electronic execution]]
{{ref}}