82,883
edits
Pension fund: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ | {{a|netting|}}A counterparty fraught with all sorts of complexity, fear, loathing etc, because it is looking after the retirement funds of grandmas and grandads around the world. This means that pension funds, and in particular their regulators, have the power to terrify counterparties at the mere crinkling of a brow. | ||
*In the UK, the [[Pension Protection Fund]] can induce minor infarctions, and there is even a {{isdaprov|PPF Event}} {{isdaprov|Additional Termination Event}} to cater for it. | *In the UK, the [[Pension Protection Fund]] can induce minor infarctions, and there is even a {{isdaprov|PPF Event}} {{isdaprov|Additional Termination Event}} to cater for it. | ||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
[[Pension fund]] is one of {{t|ISDA}}’s vaunted {{tag|netting}} categories. | [[Pension fund]] is one of {{t|ISDA}}’s vaunted {{tag|netting}} categories. | ||
{{quote|{{pensionfund}} | |||
<small><small>''[[:template:pensionfund|view template]]''</small></small> | <small><small>''[[:template:pensionfund|view template]]''</small></small>}} | ||
{{sa}} | {{sa}} | ||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
*[[close-out netting]] | *[[close-out netting]] | ||
*[[ISDA Anatomy]] | *[[ISDA Anatomy]] | ||
{{c|Netting Categories}} | |||
{{c| | |||