81,898
edits
Performance appraisal: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
You could call it many things: a orchestrated scheme for institutionalising nepotism; a sanctioned suburbia of rotten boroughs; management-sponsored low-level cronyism; a [[massive multi-player online role-playing game]] or, most emphatically, a colossal, unflinchingly tedious waste of an institution’s collected time and resources. | {{A|people|}}You could call it many things: a orchestrated scheme for institutionalising nepotism; a sanctioned suburbia of rotten boroughs; management-sponsored low-level cronyism; a [[massive multi-player online role-playing game]] or, most emphatically, a colossal, unflinchingly tedious waste of an institution’s collected time and resources. | ||
One thing you may be sure it is ''not'' is a meaningful way of evaluating staff. | One thing you may be sure it is ''not'' is a meaningful way of evaluating staff. | ||
| Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
In the storied history of investment banking, that would be a radical idea indeed. | In the storied history of investment banking, that would be a radical idea indeed. | ||