Performance appraisal: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{A|work|[[File:BB.jpg|thumb|center|450px|an [[HR]] Giger counter, yesterday]]}}You could call it many things: a orchestrated scheme for institutionalised nepotism; a sanctioned suburbia of rotten boroughs; management-sponsored low-level cronyism; a massive multi-player online role-playing game or, most emphatically, a colossal, unflinchingly [[tedious]] waste of an institution’s collected time and resources.
{{A|work|[[File:BB.jpg|thumb|center|450px|an [[HR]] Giger counter, yesterday]]}}{{quote|{{Deming on performance appraisal}}}}You could call it many things: a orchestrated scheme for institutionalised nepotism; a sanctioned suburbia of rotten boroughs; management-sponsored low-level cronyism; a massive multi-player online role-playing game or, most emphatically, a colossal, unflinchingly [[tedious]] waste of an institution’s collected time and resources.


One thing you may be sure it is ''not'' is a meaningful way of evaluating staff.
One thing you may be sure it is ''not'' is a meaningful way of evaluating staff.