82,891
edits
Performance appraisal: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{A|people| | {{A|people| | ||
[[File:BB.jpg|thumb|center|450px|an [[HR]] Giger counter, yesterday]] | [[File:BB.jpg|thumb|center|450px|an [[HR]] Giger counter, yesterday]] | ||
}}{{g}}You could call it many things: a orchestrated scheme for institutionalised nepotism; a sanctioned suburbia of rotten boroughs; management-sponsored low-level cronyism; a | }}{{g}}You could call it many things: a orchestrated scheme for institutionalised nepotism; a sanctioned suburbia of rotten boroughs; management-sponsored low-level cronyism; a massive multi-player online role-playing game or, most emphatically, a colossal, unflinchingly [[tedious]] waste of an institution’s collected time and resources. | ||
One thing you may be sure it is ''not'' is a meaningful way of evaluating staff. | One thing you may be sure it is ''not'' is a meaningful way of evaluating staff. | ||