Permitted Receivers - OneNDA Provision: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:


===Who’s in===
===Who’s in===
The anal amongst you — what? Oh, come ''on'' guys you ''know'' you are — any way, you anal folk may like to define those individuals to whom one may pass {{confiprov|Confidential Information}} to carry out the {{confiprov|Purpose}} as “{{confiprov|Necessary Person}}s” or something equally tedious. Those people may be:  
The anal amongst you — what? Oh, come ''on'' guys you ''know'' you are — anyway, you ''anal'' folk may like to define those individuals to whom one may pass {{confiprov|Confidential Information}} to carry out the {{confiprov|Purpose}} as “'''{{confiprov|Necessary Person}}s'''” or something equally [[tedious]]. Those people may be:  
*'''[[Professional advisers]]''': Not usually controversial because they are by nature bound by professional protocol and [[Fiduciary duty|fiduciary duties]] to respect [[confidentiality]] and may even buy you legal [[privilege]] for whatever that is worth these days.
*'''[[Professional advisers]]''': Not usually controversial because they are by nature bound by professional protocol and [[Fiduciary duty|fiduciary duties]] to respect [[confidentiality]] and may even buy you legal [[privilege]] for whatever that is worth these days.
*'''Employees''': The corporate veil may be impermeable but you do need someone with a head, any kind of head, and a beating heart to read and deal with the {{confiprov|confidential information}} on the [[limited company]]’s behalf — but more fearful types may try to restrict which of your employees are in the gang (see below).  
*'''Employees''': The corporate veil may be impermeable but you do need someone with a head, any kind of head, and a beating heart to read and deal with the {{confiprov|confidential information}} on the [[limited company]]’s behalf — but more fearful types may try to restrict which of your employees are in the gang (see below).