83,056
edits
Prior notice: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Chicken licken can have fun with this one. A prior notice must be given before the event in question, right? But what if the notice is given afterward, but is expressed t...") |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[Chicken licken]] can have fun with this one. A | {{a|plainenglish|}}[[Chicken licken]]s can have fun with this one. A “prior” notice must be given ''before'' the event in question, right? | ||
But what if the notice is given afterward, but is expressed to have retrospective effect? You may wish to strike someone who asks such a stupid question, for | But what if the notice is given ''afterward'', but is ''expressed to have retrospective effect''? You may wish to strike someone who asks such a stupid question, for such a person is indeed worthy of a walloping, but it does happen. Spotted, negotiated into a [[prime brokerage]] document — no doubt granted at length by an exasperated [[negotiator]] who was ultimately not prepared to [[die in a ditch]] about it: | ||
: | :“[[Unless otherwise agreed]], we, [[acting in good faith]], may change the terms [[applicable]] to any loan by giving you [[prior written notice]] (where [[reasonably]] [[practicable]] to you ('''''such notice not to have retrospective effect''''').” | ||
Shoot me. I mean, just shoot me. | Shoot me. I mean, just shoot me. | ||
{{sa}} | |||
{{ | *[[Ditch tolerance]] | ||