Private practice lawyer: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 7: Line 7:
Lawyers may be obliged by entry-barrier perpetuating regulations to maintain [[professional indemnity insurance]] but their no-claims bonus is safe. Even when it all goes [[pear-shaped]] — deals like this often do — it will be impossible to trace that failing back to them:  How could anyone, not across that whole body of information, hope to? The germ of dissolution, if it is their fault, will be so deeply buried in some third side-letter to the series proposal for the fourth tranche of the mezzanine financing leg that no-one else has a hope of ''finding'' it, let alone seeing it for the smoking gun it purportedly is.
Lawyers may be obliged by entry-barrier perpetuating regulations to maintain [[professional indemnity insurance]] but their no-claims bonus is safe. Even when it all goes [[pear-shaped]] — deals like this often do — it will be impossible to trace that failing back to them:  How could anyone, not across that whole body of information, hope to? The germ of dissolution, if it is their fault, will be so deeply buried in some third side-letter to the series proposal for the fourth tranche of the mezzanine financing leg that no-one else has a hope of ''finding'' it, let alone seeing it for the smoking gun it purportedly is.


'''''Will'' say''': “This time-line is very aggressive. We don’t have ''time'' for a term-sheet: Let’s go straight to docs”.<br>
'''''Will'' say''': “This time-line is very aggressive. We don’t have ''time'' for a term-sheet: Let’s go straight to docs.<br>
'''''Won’t'' say''': “Seems fine to me. No comments.”
'''''Won’t'' say''': “Seems fine to me. No comments.”