Process: Difference between revisions

4 bytes added ,  23 February 2020
no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 7: Line 7:
[[Subject matter expert]]s are also expensive. This is a cardinal sin in an industry where the highest calling is cost reduction.  
[[Subject matter expert]]s are also expensive. This is a cardinal sin in an industry where the highest calling is cost reduction.  


The ideal “[[process participant]]” costs nothing, follows instructions with perfect fidelity, doesn’t break down, makes no errors, and certainly doesn't ''think'' or ''question'' the process: that is, it is ''a computer''. In the same way a machine doesn't question its program (it can’t), a [[process participant]] escalates within the process, but doesn’t question it. the difference is that cantankerous human process participants ''can''.
The ideal “[[process participant]]” costs nothing, follows instructions with perfect fidelity, doesn’t break down, makes no errors, and certainly doesn’t ''think'' or ''question'' the process: that is, it is ''a computer''. In the same way a machine doesn’t question its program (it can’t), a [[process participant]] escalates within the process, but doesn’t question it. the difference is that cantankerous human process participants ''can''.


But therein the problem: '''if the process ''can'' be computerised, why ''hasn’t'' it been?'''   
But therein the problem: '''if the process ''can'' be computerised, why ''hasn’t'' it been?'''