Promptly: Difference between revisions

24 bytes removed ,  19 November 2019
no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 12: Line 12:


In any case, unless Party B is both gagging to close this poor fund, and possessed of some unnatural intelligence as to its precise internal workings, as a covenant it is literally unenforceable in any case. Here are the possible scenarios after Party A changes its investment policy:
In any case, unless Party B is both gagging to close this poor fund, and possessed of some unnatural intelligence as to its precise internal workings, as a covenant it is literally unenforceable in any case. Here are the possible scenarios after Party A changes its investment policy:
#'''Party A does not tell Party B of the change ''at all'' but Party B is oblivious to the change''': Party A has breached its covenant, but Party B cannot know this, so is in no position to take any action. Hard cheese, Party B!
#'''Party A does not tell Party B ''at all''. Party B is oblivious to the change''': Party A has breached its covenant, but Party B cannot know this, so is in no position to take any action. Hard cheese, Party B!
#'''Party A does not tell Party B of the change ''at all'' but Party B somehow gets wind of it''': Party A has breached its contract, Party B knows of it, but because Party B knows about it, it is in exactly the position it would have been in had Party A complied with the contract, and cannot therefore suffer any loss as a result.  
#'''Party A does not tell Party B ''at all''. Somehow, Party B finds out anyway''': Party A has breached its contract, Party B knows this but, precisely ''because'' Party B knows about it, Party B is no worse of than had Party A told it, and cannot really suffer any loss as a result.  
#'''Party A does not tell Party B of the change ''at first'' and hasn’t yet, but will do eventually, after an unreasonable delay''':  Same as 1: To paraphrase the head chef at Fawlty Towers, [[What the eye don’t see the chef gets away with|eye is not seeing, so the chef is getting away with it]].
#'''Party A does not tell Party B ''at first''. It will eventually, after an unreasonable delay, but hasn’t yet''':  Same as 1: To paraphrase Terry, head cook at ''Fawlty Towers'', [[What the eye don’t see the chef gets away with|the eye is not seeing, so the chef is getting away with it]].
#'''Party A does not tell Party B of the change ''at first'' but then does tell Party B, only after an unreasonable delay''': By the time Party B finds out the contract has both been breached ''and remedied'', so it is hard to see what action lies.
#'''Party A does not tell Party B ''at first''. Then, after an unreasonable delay, it does tell Party B''': Same as 2. By the time Party B finds out the contract has both been breached ''and remedied'', so it is hard to see what action lies.


“Immediately” might ''look'' severe, but it has a handsome economy quite lacking from “[[as soon as reasonably practicable]]”. A [[prose stylist]] might feel forcing such an inelegance on an already ungainly contract to be an unnecessary step. But it is not a hill that many negotiators would die on.
“Immediately” might ''look'' severe, but it has a handsome economy quite lacking from “[[as soon as reasonably practicable]]”. A [[prose stylist]] might feel forcing such an inelegance on an already ungainly contract to be an unnecessary step. But it is not a hill that many negotiators would die on.
Line 22: Line 22:
*The difference between [[practical|practi''cal'']] and [[practicable|practi''cable'']].
*The difference between [[practical|practi''cal'']] and [[practicable|practi''cable'']].
*[[As soon as possible but in any event not later than]]
*[[As soon as possible but in any event not later than]]
*[[What the eye don’t see the chef gets away with]]