82,891
edits
Proprietary information: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{a|confi|}}''For a rumination our habit to wilfully confuse a dull public utility with proprietary information see [[secret sauce]]''. | {{a|confi|}}''For a rumination our habit to wilfully confuse a dull public utility with proprietary information see [[secret sauce]]''. | ||
{{d|Proprietary information |/ | {{d|Proprietary information |/prəˈpraɪətəriˌɪnfəˈmeɪʃən/|n|}} | ||
Information that is ''capable'' of ownership and that is owned. [[Intellectual property]]. | Information that is ''capable'' of ownership and that is owned. [[Intellectual property]]. | ||
Careful, trooper. It is fun to throw around big words, but be aware of what they mean. “[[Proprietary]]”, so our good friends on the world wide web tell us, | Careful, trooper. It is fun to throw around big words, but be aware of what they mean. “[[Proprietary]]”, so our good friends on the world wide web tell us, means “of or relating to an [[owner]] or [[ownership]]”. | ||
Ownership implies a [[property]] right of some sort.<ref>Quoth [[Google]]: “The right to the possession, use, or disposal of something; ''[[ownership]]''.”</ref> When it comes to [[information]], “ownership” is a slippery concept. Only certain kinds of information may be “owned” at all— those that qualify as [[intellectual property]]: [[copyright]]ed material; [[patent]]s and [[trade mark]]s. But permissions to use, or transfer, ''proprietary rights'' in information are ''not'' a fit subject for a [[confidentiality agreement]]. For those you need a licence agreement. An [[NDA]] is about what you may ''not'' do with information to which you already have an implied licence. This is a contractual restriction: its breach sounds in damages, for loss caused to the discloser. The use, for profit, of information owned by someone else is not, of itself, a breach of contract but an infringement of proprietary rights for which the remedy is an account for profits. | Ownership implies a [[property]] right of some sort.<ref>Quoth [[Google]]: “The right to the possession, use, or disposal of something; ''[[ownership]]''.”</ref> When it comes to [[information]], “ownership” is a slippery concept. Only certain kinds of information may be “owned” at all— those that qualify as [[intellectual property]]: [[copyright]]ed material; [[patent]]s and [[trade mark]]s. But permissions to use, or transfer, ''proprietary rights'' in information are ''not'' a fit subject for a [[confidentiality agreement]]. For those you need a licence agreement. An [[NDA]] is about what you may ''not'' do with information to which you already have an implied licence. This is a contractual restriction: its breach sounds in damages, for loss caused to the discloser. The use, for profit, of information owned by someone else is not, of itself, a breach of contract but an infringement of proprietary rights for which the remedy is an account for profits. | ||