Public domain: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 8: Line 8:
But “public domain” also has a technical, narrower definition hailing from the law of [[copyright]]: information that is “in the public domain” is information that ''could be'' protected by [[intellectual property]] rights, but ''isn’t'', whether because those rights have expired, been forfeited, waived, or for some other reason just don’t apply.
But “public domain” also has a technical, narrower definition hailing from the law of [[copyright]]: information that is “in the public domain” is information that ''could be'' protected by [[intellectual property]] rights, but ''isn’t'', whether because those rights have expired, been forfeited, waived, or for some other reason just don’t apply.


Being open source, the [[OneNDA]] itself is “in the public domain” in this narrow way. But the information one may share under it is not. Yet, in its “carve out” from the scope of confidentiality, the first version excludes information that is “in the public domain” rather than simply “public”.
Being open source, the [[OneNDA]] itself is “in the public domain” in this narrow way. But the information one may share under it is not. Yet, in its “[[carve out]]” from the scope of confidentiality, the first version excludes information that is “in the public domain” rather than simply “public”.


This is a cue for [[Doyen of drafting|those who take pleasure from such things]], to raise a [[Knee-slide and jet wings|technical objection]].  
This is a cue for [[Doyen of drafting|those who take pleasure from such things]], to raise a [[Knee-slide and jet wings|technical objection]].