|
|
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| {{confianat|Receiver}}The [[legal person]] by whom a [[confidentiality obligation]] is owed, to be (but often not) sharply contrasted with its mortal earthly representatives, being its directors, officers, agents, employees and [[professional advisers]] for whom, should [[confidential information]] pass into their hands, it is contractually responsible. | | {{confianat|1(a)}}The [[legal person]] by whom a [[confidentiality obligation]] is owed, to be (but often not) sharply contrasted with its mortal earthly representatives, being its directors, officers, agents, employees and [[professional advisers]] for whom, should [[confidential information]] pass into their hands, it is contractually responsible. |
|
| |
|
| A confidentiality arrangement is notionally an asymmetrical one, which will prompt fears in the brow of the diligent [[legal eagle]] confronted with such a tract that it is therefore somehow ''one-sided''. A neat [[negotiation hack]] to dissuade this kind of thinking is to make the [[confidentiality agreement]] ''mutual'' even when, in point of actual fact, the parties only really anticipate the flow of [[confidential information]] going one way. It is a small and patently fatuous thing, but it does seem to work.
| | {{confi mutuality}} |
|
| |
|
| {{sa}} | | {{sa}} |
| {{c|Negotiation hacks}} | | *{{confiprov|Discloser}} |
| | *[[Negotiation hacks]] |