82,891
edits
Reg tech: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{a|tech|}} | {{a|tech|}} | ||
===Why is reg tech so disappointing?=== | ===Why is reg tech so disappointing?=== | ||
*[[Document assembly]] has been around for | *[[Document assembly]] has been around for a good 15 years — they thought it was inevitable disruptive thecnology in 2006<ref>See Darrel R Mountain’s OUP monograph on the subject from 2006 [https://academic.oup.com/ijlit/article-abstract/15/2/170/683915 “Disrupting Conventional Law Firm Business Models using Document Assembly”]</ref> and it still doesn't work very well. | ||
:*It's capabilities are limited, it costs a lot (no one has figured out a sensible model) and it is difficult to implement. | :*It's capabilities are limited, it costs a lot (no one has figured out a sensible model) and it is difficult to implement. | ||
:*Few applications use clause libraries, there is no self - validating logic, few templates or pre-mades units. | :*Few applications use clause libraries, there is no self - validating logic, few templates or pre-mades units. | ||