Rent-seeking: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{g}}{{a|tech|}}[[Rent-seeking]] is the Marxist (ooh! saucy!) term when a fellow (a “[[rentier]]”) monopolises access to [[property]] (including, for modern readings, [[intellectual property]]) and gouging profits out of it.  
{{g}}{{a|tech|}}[[Rent-seeking]] is the Marxist (ooh! saucy!) term when a fellow (a “[[rentier]]”) monopolises access to [[property]] (including, for modern readings, [[intellectual property]]) and gouging profits out of it.  


Rather than the fruits of your blood, toil, tears and sweat you use antediluvian<ref>{{author|Lawrence Lessig}}’s {{Br|Code: Version 2.0}} is a compulsory read.</ref> [[intellectual property]] rules to gouge everyone else.
It comes in many guises:
 
*[[Physical property]] — you know, ''literal'' rent-seeking
Also known as [[software as a service]].
*[[Intellectual property]] — Rather than using the fruits of your blood, toil, tears and sweat you use antediluvian<ref>{{author|Lawrence Lessig}}’s {{Br|Code: Version 2.0}} is a compulsory read.</ref> [[intellectual property]] rules to gouge everyone else. In this way Mick Jagger and Keith Richards can extract millions over 60 years from 15 minutes of work — in Richards’ case, while he was asleep — composing ''[[Satisfaction]]''.
*[[Franchising]]: Taking an idea or a business model someone else has invented — McDonald’s is the best example — and paying them a franchise fee to operate it. Here is ''double'' rent-seeking: the franchisee pays the franchisor, and the customer pays the ''franchisee''.
*[[Software as a service]]: The simple answer to the question [[why is reg tech so disappointing?]] — is that tech businesses can’t make money if all they get paid for is writing software. This would be like Mick Jagger only getting paid for fifteen minutes’ work — where is the logic, or the justice in that?
{{sa}}
{{sa}}
*[[Reg tech]]
*[[Reg tech]]
*[[Intermediaries]]
*[[Intermediaries]]
{{ref}}
{{ref}}