82,853
edits
Repackaging programme: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
You know, the ones from TV’s “[[CHiPs]]”<ref>Youngsters: {{google|CHiPs}}.</ref> | You know, the ones from TV’s “[[CHiPs]]”<ref>Youngsters: {{google|CHiPs}}.</ref> | ||
When contemplating the legal contracts around a repackaging programme, it is well to remember: an [[espievie]] is like a zombie queen ant, prostrate in its Caribbean nest, immobile, pinned down and paralysed, while a small army of drones, agents, bots and pleasure-droids crawl over it, administering necessary opioids and analgesics so that the various investors, hedge counterparties and agents can do whatever it is they want to do to each other under a prophylactic cloak of non-responsibility. It is rather like swimming in wellingtons, we are told. | When contemplating the legal contracts around a repackaging programme, it is well to remember: an [[espievie]] is like a zombie queen ant, prostrate in its Caribbean nest, immobile, pinned down and paralysed, while a small army of [[Swap dealer|drones]], [[Calculation agent|agents]], bots and pleasure-droids crawl over it, administering necessary opioids and analgesics so that the various [[Client|investors]], [[Swap dealer|hedge counterparties]] and agents can do whatever it is they want to do to each other under a prophylactic cloak of non-responsibility. It is rather like swimming in wellingtons, we are told. | ||
===A quick word about limited recourse=== | ===A quick word about limited recourse=== | ||