82,891
edits
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{a|confcall|}}The fundamental [[Ontology|ontological]] character of a participant, other than oneself<ref>[[Büchstein]] followed Descartes in calling this subject [[res cogitans]], the “thinking” (or in some translations, “suffering” thing.</ref>, in a [[all-hands conference call]] as distinct from that person’s corporeal body, their personality, their outside interests (in football, knitting, sailing, ornithology, or any other damn thing on the planet but this benighted [[conference call]] etc) | {{a|confcall|}}The fundamental [[Ontology|ontological]] character of a participant, other than oneself<ref>[[Büchstein]] followed Descartes in calling this subject [[res cogitans]], the “thinking” (or, in some translations, “suffering”) thing.</ref>, in a [[all-hands conference call]] as distinct from that person’s corporeal body, their personality, their outside interests (in football, knitting, sailing, ornithology, or any other damn thing on the planet but this benighted [[conference call]] etc). | ||
{{ | This came from [[Otto Büchstein]] on his ''[[Discourse on Intercourse]]'', whose aphorism ''[[convenimus ergo es]]'' sharply criticised [[Descartes]] more famous formulation, “[[cogito ergo sum]]”. | ||
{{sa}} | |||
*[[All-hands conference call]] | *[[All-hands conference call]] | ||
*[[Otto Büchstein]] | *[[Otto Büchstein]] |