Res verbositans: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{a|confcall|}}The fundamental [[Ontology|ontological]] character of a participant, other than oneself<ref>[[Büchstein]] followed Descartes in calling this subject [[res cogitans]], the “thinking” (or in some translations, “suffering” thing.</ref>, in a [[all-hands conference call]] as distinct from that person’s corporeal body, their personality, their outside interests (in football, knitting, sailing, ornithology, or any other damn thing on the planet but this benighted [[conference call]] etc). This came from [[Otto Büchstein]] on his ''[[Discourse on Intercourse]]'', whose aphorism ''[[convenimus ergo es]]'' sharply criticised [[Descartes]] more famous formulation, “[[cogito ergo sum]]”.
{{a|confcall|}}The fundamental [[Ontology|ontological]] character of a participant, other than oneself<ref>[[Büchstein]] followed Descartes in calling this subject [[res cogitans]], the “thinking” (or, in some translations, “suffering”) thing.</ref>, in a [[all-hands conference call]] as distinct from that person’s corporeal body, their personality, their outside interests (in football, knitting, sailing, ornithology, or any other damn thing on the planet but this benighted [[conference call]] etc).  


{{seealso}}
This came from [[Otto Büchstein]] on his ''[[Discourse on Intercourse]]'', whose aphorism ''[[convenimus ergo es]]'' sharply criticised [[Descartes]] more famous formulation, “[[cogito ergo sum]]”.
 
{{sa}}
*[[All-hands conference call]]
*[[All-hands conference call]]
*[[Otto Büchstein]]
*[[Otto Büchstein]]