Restitution: Difference between revisions

← Older edit

Restitution (view source)

Revision as of 18:08, 30 March 2021

283 bytes added , 30 March 2021

no edit summary

Amwelladmin

Bureaucrats, Interface administrators, Administrators

82,891

edits

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-A claim made feasible through an imaginative synthesis of long-“forgotten” rules of the {{tag|common law}} dreamt up by Lord Goff to bring justice to [[little old ladies]].
+{{a|restitution|}}{{d|Restitution|/ˌrɛstɪˈtjuːʃən/|n|}}<br>
-Gave rise to an entire branch of civil law known as [[restitution]], which sits uneasily between the law of [[contract]] and [[tort]], seeming as it does to confuse the two.
+A judicial life-hack to cover the parts of commercial life that the [[common law]] traditions of [[tort]] and [[contract]] somehow contrive to miss.
-Known by some as [[money had and received]] and by others as [[unjust enrichment]] but in any case not to be confused with [[unjustified enrichment|''unjustified'' enrichment]], which is the compensation plan for those who make it to the [[C-suite]].
+{{restitution capsule}}
-{{seealso}}
+The source of some excitement, fear and loathing in the hands of the New York District Court, who in {{casenote|Citigroup|Brigade Capital Management}} applied the [[discharge-for-value defense]] to a [[restitution]] claim with rather more enthusiasm than seems warranted. The law in England (see {{casenote|Barclays Bank Ltd|WJ Simms}}) would lead to a different outcome.
+Known also as “[[money had and received]]” and “[[unjust enrichment]]”, in any case it is not to be confused with [[unjustified enrichment|''unjustified'' enrichment]], which is the [[compensation]] plan for those who make it to the [[C-suite]].
+{{sa}}
+*[[Equitable remedies]]
 *[[contract]]
 *[[tort]]
 *[[damages]]
+{{ref}}
-{{egg}}