Results-driven: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
No edit summary
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{a|shitmaxim|{{image|Hindenburg|jpg|A results-driven airship pilot yesterday.}}}}The accountants’ favourite chocolatier (and our ''second'' favourite chocolatier, after our own in-house chocolatiers, [[Maple, Maple et Cie|Les Frères Maple]], who ) [[Marc de Marquette]], tells us:
{{a|shitmaxim|{{image|pripyat|jpg|A results-driven village in Ukraine yesterday.}}}}The accountants’ favourite chocolatier (and our ''second'' favourite chocolatier, after our own in-house chocolatiers, [[Maple, Maple et Cie|Les Frères Maple]]) Marc de Marquette, tells us:
{{quote|“''Marc is driven by results and no better way for him to demonstrate his excellence than winning [[awards]] for his creations and his clients.''”}}
{{quote|“''Marc is driven by results and no better way for him to demonstrate his excellence than winning [[awards]] for his creations and his clients.''”}}


Not to pick on Marc — some bored copyrighter most likely put those words in his mouth, and look: he’s a chocolate guy, not a marketing guy — but we wonder what he, or any of the dreary multitudes driven to apply this sodden phrase in self-description on their [[LinkedIn]] profiles — can possibly mean. How can one be propelled by the expected outcome of one’s propulsion? This is surely to put the cart before the horse.  
Not to pick on Monsieur de Marquette — some bored copyrighter most likely put those words in his mouth, and look: he’s a chocolate guy, not a marketing guy — but we wonder what he, or any of the dreary multitudes driven to apply this sodden phrase in self-description on their [[LinkedIn]] profiles — can possibly mean.  


Given that ''a'' “result”, of ''some'' kind, is the thermodynamic expectation of every application of force to object however ill-advised, we wonder what people think they are establishing by claiming to be “results-driven”.  
For how can one be ''propelled'' by the expected outcome of one’s own propulsion? This is surely to put the cart before the horse.
 
Given that ''a'' “result”, of ''some'' kind, is the thermodynamic expectation of every application of force to object, however ill-advised, we wonder what people think they are establishing by claiming to be “results-driven”.  


The captain of the [[Hindenburg]] got results, after all. So did the deputy chief engineer at Chernobyl. And [[Lehman Brothers|Dick Fuld]]. Just not particularly ''good'' ones.
The captain of the [[Hindenburg]] got results, after all. So did the deputy chief engineer at Chernobyl. And [[Lehman Brothers|Dick Fuld]]. Just not particularly ''good'' ones.


So unless your industry is to distinguish yourself from those with whom you work who have ''no'' discernible impact on its operation, good or ill — in fairness, that’s most of them — then you might want to put something a little more specific in your professional autobiography. Or just lie about it. And if you can’t — well: ''are'' you having a discernible impact?
So unless your industry is to distinguish yourself from those with whom you work who have ''no'' discernible impact on the world, good or ill — in fairness, that’s a great number of people — then you might want to put something a little more specific in your professional autobiography than “results-driven”.  
 
Or just lie about it. And if you can’t even do that — well: ''are'' you having a discernible impact?


{{sa}}
{{sa}}