Rock Advertising Ltd v MWB Business Exchange Centres Ltd: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
(Created page with "{{rock advertising}} {{ref}}")
 
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
Brand new nonsense from the learned souls in the Supreme Court. This time, concerning [[no oral modification]] clauses — hitherto understood by all to be harmless fluff injected into the boiler plate by unthinking clerks, and understood by all (including the Court of Appeal) to carry no forensic content at all, wherein parties — and let’s be honest here, it’s really just their lawyers — vainly purport to require amendments to be documented in a written agreement.
Not so vain after all, it seems:
{{rock advertising}}
{{rock advertising}}


{{ref}}
{{ref}}