82,891
edits
Rock Advertising Ltd v MWB Business Exchange Centres Ltd: Difference between revisions
Rock Advertising Ltd v MWB Business Exchange Centres Ltd (view source)
Revision as of 13:13, 18 May 2018
, 18 May 2018no edit summary
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Brand new nonsense from the learned souls in the Supreme Court. | {{casenote|Rock Advertising Limited|MWB Business Exchange Centres Limited}} [https://www.supremecourt.uk/cases/uksc-2016-0152.html] Brand new nonsense from the learned souls in the Supreme Court. | ||
This time, concerning [[no oral modification]] clauses — hitherto understood by all to be harmless fluff injected into the boilerplate by [[Mediocre lawyer|unthinking clerks]], and understood by all (including the Court of Appeal) to carry no forensic content at all, wherein parties — and let’s be honest here, it’s really just their lawyers — vainly purport to require amendments to be documented in a written agreement. For who else would benefit from such a tiresome formal stricture? | This time, concerning [[no oral modification]] clauses — hitherto understood by all to be harmless fluff injected into the boilerplate by [[Mediocre lawyer|unthinking clerks]], and understood by all (including the Court of Appeal) to carry no forensic content at all, wherein parties — and let’s be honest here, it’s really just their lawyers — vainly purport to require amendments to be documented in a written agreement. For who else would benefit from such a tiresome formal stricture? | ||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
{{seealso}} | {{seealso}} | ||
*[https://www.supremecourt.uk/cases/uksc-2016-0152.html Official judgment] | |||
*{{Casenote|Greenclose|National Westminster Bank plc}} for similar curial nonsense. | *{{Casenote|Greenclose|National Westminster Bank plc}} for similar curial nonsense. | ||
{{ref}} | {{ref}} | ||