82,853
edits
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{review|Rocks of Ages: Science and Religion in the Fullness of Life|Stephen Jay Gould|14 August 2007|R27WZ9OTS1WKCG|A much better book than its detractors claim|}} If you’...") |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{review|Rocks of Ages: Science and Religion in the Fullness of Life|Stephen Jay Gould|14 August 2007 | {{review|Rocks of Ages: Science and Religion in the Fullness of Life|Stephen Jay Gould|R27WZ9OTS1WKCG|14 August 2007|A much better book than its detractors claim|}} | ||
If you’ve read any of the clutter of recent books on evolutionary science or popular atheism, you’ll know that {{author|Stephen Jay Gould}} - and particularly this book, {{br|Rocks of Ages}} comes with something of a health warning: Gould, despite great eminence and magisterial publishing history, is seen by a certain clique of like-minded authors within the biological community as being damaged goods and this attempt at popular philosophy, with its central thesis of “Non-Overlapping Magisteria” (“NOMA”) - an attempt at peaceful mediation between science and religion - is given short shrift by such authors, and elsewhere tends to be put down to Gould’s compromised situation when he wrote it (terminally ill with cancer). Since his death a few years ago, Rocks of Ages has lost an able champion and as a result looks set to disappear quietly beneath the waves of the current, squally debate. | If you’ve read any of the clutter of recent books on evolutionary science or popular atheism, you’ll know that {{author|Stephen Jay Gould}} - and particularly this book, {{br|Rocks of Ages}} comes with something of a health warning: Gould, despite great eminence and magisterial publishing history, is seen by a certain clique of like-minded authors within the biological community as being damaged goods and this attempt at popular philosophy, with its central thesis of “Non-Overlapping Magisteria” (“NOMA”) - an attempt at peaceful mediation between science and religion - is given short shrift by such authors, and elsewhere tends to be put down to Gould’s compromised situation when he wrote it (terminally ill with cancer). Since his death a few years ago, Rocks of Ages has lost an able champion and as a result looks set to disappear quietly beneath the waves of the current, squally debate. |