Rome II: Difference between revisions

44 bytes added ,  20 September 2016
no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 9: Line 9:
Rome II doesn't apply to company law or defamation, either. Though it's kind of hard to see how you could have a contractual obligation to defame someone.
Rome II doesn't apply to company law or defamation, either. Though it's kind of hard to see how you could have a contractual obligation to defame someone.


But point to note here: the main thing is to ensure any [[concurrent liability|claims]] in [[contract]] and [[tort]] are governed by the same forum. Of most interest in cross border cases where parties are in different jurisdictions and that wouldn't follow as a matter of course. and even there, frankly, a concurrent claim in tort would only be relevant in most cases to [[concurrent liability|builders]].
But point to note here: the main thing is to ensure any [[concurrent liability|claims]] in {{tag|contract}} and [[tort]] are governed by the same forum. Of most interest in cross-border cases where parties are in different jurisdictions and that wouldn't follow as a matter of course. and even there, frankly, a concurrent claim in {{tag|tort}} would only be relevant in most cases to [[concurrent liability|builders]].


Of course, the sensible thing would be to expressly exclude tortious claims under the contract. But for those not prescient enough to do that, there's always this magic incantation.
Of course, the sensible thing would be to expressly exclude tortious claims under the {{tag|contract}}. But for those not prescient enough to do that, there's always this [[magic words|magic]] incantation.


===Jurisdiction: you choose!===
===Jurisdiction: you choose!===
Parties can agree to submit non-contractual obligations to the law of their choice. Previously English courts haven't been sure as to whether this is cricket. Rome II confirms that it is:  
Parties can agree to submit non-contractual obligations to the law of their choice. Previously English courts haven't been sure as to whether this is {{tag|cricket}}. Rome II confirms that it is:  
*Where the agreement was made after the event giving rise to the damage; or   
*Where the agreement was made after the event giving rise to the damage; or   
*Where all parties are pursuing a commercial activity, if freely negotiated ''before'' the event giving rise to the damage occurred.
*Where all parties are pursuing a commercial activity, if freely negotiated ''before'' the event giving rise to the damage occurred.