82,891
edits
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{fullanat2|cobs|2.3.1||2.3A.3|}} | {{fullanat2|cobs|2.3.1||2.3A.3|}}This is the {{tag|FCA}}’s general {{cobsprov|Rule on Inducements}} —and more to the point, avoiding them — and as you’ll see it is cast with an eye to the {{fcaprov|client}}’s best interests. Compare with specific rules on [[Use of dealing commissions - COBS Provision|use of dealing commissions]], which some might say are no more than an articulation of these, but others would say are quite a lot more restrictive, but which relate only to {{cobsprov|firm}}s which act as {{cobsprov|investment manager}}s — potentially a key difference, because it would not catch a [[broker]] or [[dealer]] where it accepts orders from an [[investment manager]] who was not an FCA regulated {{cobsprov|firm}} (i.e., a foreigner). | ||
This is the {{tag|FCA}}’s general {{cobsprov|Rule on Inducements}} —and more to the point, avoiding them — and as you’ll see it is cast with an eye to the {{fcaprov|client}}’s best interests. Compare with specific rules on [[Use of dealing commissions - COBS Provision|use of dealing commissions]], which some might say are no more than an articulation of these, but others would say are quite a lot more restrictive, but which relate only to {{cobsprov|firm}}s which act as {{cobsprov|investment manager}}s | |||
To be clear, in this case the general {{cobsprov|rule on inducements}} would continue to apply to the [[broker]]: just not the more detailed {{cobsprov|use of dealing commissions}} rules. | |||
Want to take your client to Wimbledon? Forget about it. | Want to take your client to Wimbledon? Forget about it. |