82,891
edits
Rye v Rye: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{a|casenote|}}{{cite|Rye|Rye|1962|AC|496}} stands as common law authority — from Lord Denning, no less — for the proposition that a man cannot grant himself a lea...") |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
A sanguine explanation is no doubt to be found in the 1962 volume of the Appeals Cases and, being penned by one of the great literary figures of the modern legal era, would doubtless repay reading, but — inasmuch as it would displace the mental image I currently have of a man pursuing himself to the highest tribunal in the land to contest his right to occupy his own house, it would still rank as a disappointment, so I do not propose to find out what it is, and would thank anyone who does happen to know, to keep it to themselves. | A sanguine explanation is no doubt to be found in the 1962 volume of the Appeals Cases and, being penned by one of the great literary figures of the modern legal era, would doubtless repay reading, but — inasmuch as it would displace the mental image I currently have of a man pursuing himself to the highest tribunal in the land to contest his right to occupy his own house, it would still rank as a disappointment, so I do not propose to find out what it is, and would thank anyone who does happen to know, to keep it to themselves. | ||
{{Sa}} | |||
*[[Counterparts]] | |||
*[[Inter-affiliate ISDA negotiation]] | |||
{{ref}} | {{ref}} | ||