83,049
edits
SEC no-action letter relating to prime brokerage: Difference between revisions
SEC no-action letter relating to prime brokerage (view source)
Revision as of 17:53, 9 February 2021
, 9 February 2021no edit summary
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
The prime broker committee, chaired by Bear Stearns (remember them?) sought clarity from the SEC that a normal PB settlement would not be. It proposed to treat the “trade settlement” transaction between the [[prime broker]] and [[executing broker]] as an inter-dealer (principal) trade even though theoretically executed as [[agent]] for the customer. The SEC granted it, in the no-action letter. | The prime broker committee, chaired by Bear Stearns (remember them?) sought clarity from the SEC that a normal PB settlement would not be. It proposed to treat the “trade settlement” transaction between the [[prime broker]] and [[executing broker]] as an inter-dealer (principal) trade even though theoretically executed as [[agent]] for the customer. The SEC granted it, in the no-action letter. | ||
{{sa}} | |||
*[https://www.sec.gov/divisions/marketreg/mr-noaction/pbroker012594-out.pdf The famous SEC no-action letter] | |||