|
|
| (3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| {{fullanat|csa|1(b)|2016}} | | {{a|csa|}}There is no provision in the {{csa}}. It was introduced in the {{vmcsa}} and {{nyvmcsa}}. |
| ===Yes, the drafting’s magic, isn’t it?===
| |
| In the year of our Lord 2016, it is gratifying to see that the good people of {{tag|ISDA}} and their friends, relations, cherubim and seraphin, gog and magog etc., are all still as fearful of the language they learned at their mothers' knees as ever. “[[If any]]” makes four appearances in an eight line clause which doesn’t say much in the first place.
| |
| ===But what does it mean?===
| |
| This seems to be contemplating those who wished to “[[grandfather]]” {{isdaprov|Transaction}}s which were already on foot at the time the [[regulatory margin]] obligation came into force, but which therefore preceded it and were out of scope for it. Cue a monstrously painful ''dual''-CSA regime where new transactions were margined under a new, [[regulatory margin]]-compliant {{2016csa}}, and old ones were allowed to roll off on the clapped out (but somehow better'', right?) {{1995csa}}.
| |
| | |
| No doubt this made sound commercial sense in 2015, a few years later, for all bar those with 30 year inflation swaps on the books, all this {{csaprov|Other CSA}} chat is just barnacle-encrusted codified confusion for everyone.
| |
|
| |
|
| {{sa}} | | {{sa}} |
| *{{csaprov|Other CSA}}
| | {{vmcsaprov|Scope of this Annex and the Other CSA}} under the {{vmcsa}} |